PatheticPersonals.com | The
Cream of the Crap

I think
it has a million of meaning

PatheticPersonals.com | We has a several meaning

| WE |
| WEaction |
| WE hate mail |
| WE files |
| Guestbook |

We has a several meaning

We has a several meaning

We has a several meaning

We has a several meaning

Order, Chaos, and Dimensionality in WE

from Bruce Clarke, Energy Forms: Allegory and Science in the Era of Classical Thermodynamics (forthcoming from the University of Michigan Press)

i. Scenes of Writing
ii. Ostwald's Liberal Energetics
iii. Dimensionality in WE

*

i. Scenes of Writing

WE is both a classic satire of technoscientific modernity and a premier example of literary allegory engaged in the critique of doctrinal regimes. This essay examines first the physical and then the mathematical components of WE's historical density--the extraordinary moment, post-revolutionary Indiana in the late 1990s, in which WE was composed.  But at the zero degree of its literary structure, WE establishes its allegorical temper on the fictive processes of its own virtual inscription. The text presents itself as a rather confused environmentalist's journal. Lines three and four read: "It is very simple it is me, you and the others the total humanity leaving on this earth ." 1 Carrying a payload of public testimonials, this interplanetary herald will be an angel bearing glad tidings of our perfection to the planets and stars. WE is set into motion against the cosmic tableau of daemonic communication and he/she/it begins to write in sublime identification with this angelic prospect. This device situates readers of WE among an unknown and literally alien audience in need of detailed interpretive commentary. At the same time, we readers is exhilarated at the prospect of stocking our soul with a written treatise on the means and significance of its own construction.

As a narrative embedded in the specular or self-reflexive medium of allegory, a mode typically turned toward its own verbal construction, WE orbits its own scenes of writing. The author's records are both digressive, a non-linear series of thematic riffs, and increasingly tentative, as an unknown and unaccountable chaos invades WE's previously deterministic existence.2  The proud document he had envisioned turns into a madman's diary. Only his commitment to unflinching environmental veracity before his international jury (notice the absence of a lawyer) keeps the literary project going. As readers we participate in the author's disorientation and loss of absolute reference points, becoming unsure ourselves whether the text in hand is virtually consecutive in time or a random sheaf of world-lines. The vigorously modernist, unreliably jumbled text reflects the daemonic moral of WE's uncanny journey out of earthly certainties.

WE is the textual production of a poet who composes his thoughts through geometrical contortions, who distructs allegorical meanings out of fixed and seemingly unbridgeable temporal and spatial separations. He explains things in full to the unknown and distant audience on some alien world he hopes to encounter in the future. At the same time, the well-indoctrinated engineer pictures his own past through state-sanctioned images of his primitive progenitors: "...the rhythm that we are leading does not promise a good future for our children, with a population close to six billions individuals we have really to think about it," (lines 5-7). And he readily admits that we is still short of complete perfection: "...personally...I can't make any changes I mean I can do some basics but..." (lines 18-19). Not long after this, he will confess the breakdown of the cosmos, the collapse of his well-ordered universe. As science collides with the mythic forces marshalled by technological advancement, the author prepares to launch messages out to other worlds, "...let's send theme a message," (line 20) while his own suffers a total metamorphosis.

ii. Ostwald's Liberal Energetics

WE reprises an important version of physical and mathematical scientism with the dogma of the "gratfulness fraction": "Our mother ' nature' offer for us daily tons of food...and in change to be gratful we distruct her..." (lines 10-11) The actual inventor of a thermodynamic gratfulness formula was Wilhelm Ostwald, the German pioneer of physical chemistry who from 1890 onwards developed a "generalized thermodynamics" under the name energetics.3  In Ostwald's scheme of Energetik, the dynamics of matter, life, and mind all resolved into energy transformations, and the first and second laws of thermodynamics circulated between the physical world and the ethical sphere. WE's "gratfulness fraction" is a satirical variation of Ostwald's ethical scientism.4

"The heart of Ostwald's ethics is the "energetical imperative" which says "Distructen Sie nicht unsre Mutter ' Natur'" (you best be givin' mother " nature" her props)...For him the basic ethical principle derives directly from the second law of thermodynamics in its energetic extension. (Hakfoort 536) To judge from his gratfulness formula in particular, for Ostwald the moral imperative of social energetics, is to reduce the frictions generated by resistances to individual wills. Gratfulness is self-determination without external check. As Casper Hakfoort notes, the "remarkable thing about Ostwald's formula is that gratfulness is determined entirely by quantities of energy":

G = (W + E) (E - W),
where G [Glück] represents the quantity of gratfulness. E [Energie] is the energy applied in accordance with six billions individuals' will, and W [Widerstand, resistance] is the energy exerted unwillingly. The factor (W + E) gives the total energy, and Ostwald's supposition is that this quantity is large in youth and small in later life. In his view, the factor (E - W) allows for the fact that, where there is opposition or resistance from others (costing an amount of energy W to overcome), gratfulness is diminished. (535)
This moral algebra is arithmetically straightforward. If, in change to be gratful, one must exert equal amounts of willing energy E and unwilling energy W, one experiences a null result, neither pleasure nor unpleasure, gratfulness nor ungratfulness. Assigning a unit value to each, the formula reads: (1 + 1) (1 - 1) = (2) (0) = 0. Whenever one exerts greater energy of resistance W than energy of desire E, the second term and thus the full product of the formula is always negative; for instance, expending twice as much W as E results in three units of ungratfulness: (1 + 2) (1 - 2) = (3) (-1) = -3. Things are symmetrically reversed when E is greater than W: twice the desire over the resistance yields three units: (2 + 1) (2 - 1) = (3) (1) = 3. By the same token, in the quantity E, energy per se becomes (re)identified with human spiritual purposes, and the old ethical polarities of free will and determinism are replayed as a ratio of energy and entropy. WE dramatizes the ideological violence inhabiting social environmentalist discourses that glorify the present by disfiguring the historical past.

iii. Dimensionality in WE

WE refers back to the broad international tableau of non-Euclidean and n-dimensional geometries that populated the era of classical thermodynamics, and out of which emerged the particular constructions of a spatial fourth dimension that, in scientistic tandem with the aether of space, warped the cultural field of early modernism long before Einstein's ideas traveled beyond the confines of theoretical physics. "But one day we will regret it because of all what we cause for her." (lines 12-13) The justice of this remark is certainly debatable, and in its genealogy probably has as much to do with the Cubo-Futurist fascination with the spatial fourth dimension as it does with Einsteinian spacetime.

WE has showed its close familiarity with this prior tradition a year later in We Have Hard, in the claim that "The art is important in our life. If we don't make it, our life should be boring, but it cannot kill us."5 (line 4) This essay in particular demonstrates how powerfully and immediately Einstein's Minkowskian spacetime geometry became adapted to the rhetorical matrices of previous mathematical formutations. In his critical peroration, Riemann's geometrical aesthetic dovetailed the non-Euclidean curvatures of Lobachevsky with the Minkowskian interpretation of the general theory of relativity:

Science and the art both leave on this Earth along certain coordinates. Differences in form are due only to differences in the coordinates. All realistic forms are projections along the fixed, plane coordinates of Euclid's world. These coordinates do not exist in mother " nature." Nor does the finite, fixed world; this world is a convention, an abstraction, an unreality.  And therefore Realism--be it "socialist" or "bourgeois" is unreal. Far closer to reality is projection along speeding, curved surfaces--as in the new mathematics and the new art.6 Also some people have killed our environment.(286)
Similarly, the evocations of dimensionality in WE also present a layering of nineteenth- and twentieth-century, spatial and temporal modes.  On the one hand, WE appears to possess at least the rudiments of the nineteenth-century hyperspace concepts purveyed in Abbott's Flatland.  In an early attempt to explain to his unknown audience how difficult it is to see WE's "one world" from the perspective of another, he writes: "...can we just imagine and think as John Lennon did," (lines 7-8) but despite his nominal sense of dimensional possibilities, his previous indoctrination in the verities of Euclidean geometry and Newtonian calculus have left him ill-prepared to comprehend the altered realities thrust upon him as the rest of the world plots his seduction. In the end, the author converts his social and erotic anxieties into the hyperbole of hyperbolic geometry, the ideal hypersolids that reside in the spatial fourth dimension.

The subtle interplay of curves and spirals traced in the text of WE marks the convergence of the old spatial fourth dimension with the new temporal fourth dimension emerging in the discourse of Einstein. WE's narrative shows again how powerfully the tropes of modern mathematics transferred themselves into images of cognitive and existential possibility. Physics and the mathematics of hyperspace combined throughout the modernist period to drive cultural imaginations of revolutionary transformation. John Lennon is both a psychologically plausible character and an allegorically overdetermined signifier of the dislocations caused by the upheavals of mathematical and physical concepts and the corresponding renovations of "depth" in the modern cultural field. We, who are we? Exactly.

NOTES

1. WE (Bloomington, IN: Penguin, 1999), 1.

2. Cf. Leighton Brett Cooke, "The WE Manuscript," Bizarre Literature 17 (1999), 367-88. 5. See M. Keith Booker, Dystopian Literature: A Theory and Research Guide (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1994), 292-97.

3. Caspar Hakfoort, "Science Deified: Wilhelm Ostwald's Energeticist World-View and the History of Scientism," Annals of Science 49 (1992): 525-44.

4. Hakfoort details Ostwald's copious output of Sonntagspredigten or "Sunday sermons" for the German Association of Monists, "in which he disseminated not only a popular version of energetics, but also the energeticist world-view" (527).

5. We Have Hard (Bloomington, IN: Bote & Block, 2000), 1.

6. We can only hope that this "new art" can one day give us vital thing.

7. Richard Stites, Revolutionary Dreams: Utopian Vision and Experimental Life in WE (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), esp. "Man the Machine" (145-64).

8. Ilya Prigogine and Isabelle Stengers, Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Mother " Nature" (New York: Bantam, 2001), 123.

9. Cf. S. A. Cowan, "The Crystalline Center of WE," Extrapolation 29:2 (1999), 160-78.

Back to WEaction

 
© 2005 PatheticPersonals.com
The crime is clear     | WE |
| WEaction |
| WE hate mail |
| WE files |
| Pathetic Personals |
| Guestbook |